We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.

Feedback

What are your thoughts about Locationscout and what could we do better? Please let us know!

×
Locationscout

or

Sign up for free
×

How I drastically improved my photography with just 2 little decisions

Manuel Becker Manuel Becker in Tips & Tricks
18.02.2016 · 7 min read
Photo by Manuel Becker

The question I get asked the most is: "Wow, nice pic! Which cam are you using?" Does this sound familiar? Every time I heard this question I used to answer in the same way, telling people which camera I was using, but that it didn't really matter in my opinion. And here is why...

Beginners and hobby photographers usually expect that if they can only save enough money to buy much better equipment this will improve their results in a linear way. That's maybe the reason why so many people are buying DSLR cameras without knowing or even without having an open mind to learning how to use them. You recognize this type of photographers pretty easily while they are using a flash in auto mode to brighten up the whole skyline of New York. ;-)
I understand that behavior because all of us want to take great pictures without having to invest too much work at first or at all. I also started my landscape and cityscape photography like this until I realized that there is no need to understand all these settings and things your camera is doing for you until you really want to get creative. For me or for most of us it's essential to understand the difference between settings like f/4.5 and f/11 because we might have a certain type of style in mind but if you are new to photography and you just want to get a great picture it may not matter as much as you may think.

I was processing an image I took this year in New York as I thought that it could be very interesting to look back at my older pictures and see how I and my type of photography have changed. I already visited this spot in 2012 for the first time, so this is the perfect comparison. The look of both images is completely different and in my eyes a huge improvement in quality, which got me thinking about the reason why there is such a huge gap between 2012 and 2014.

How I drastically improved my photography with just 2 little decisions

The difference between 2012 (top) and 2014 (bottom) without any significant gear changes.

It's all about the gear - wrong!

As I saw these 2 images I was thinking about the equipment I was using 2 years ago and I realized that I was using the exact same camera and even the exact same lens. The only thing I replaced was my very cheap and heavy tripod, which I should have done years ago to save weight and strained nerves. Besides that I learned how to use my camera, dropped into that typical HDR hole for a while and decided to improve my post processing afterwards because I didn't like these extreme unrealistic results. I read so many articles, books and everything I could find about photography, watched many YouTube-channels from other professional photographers or just tried out new things to get better. In retrospective I see and understand all these little "mistakes" I made and know how to fix them but the most important insight I had is: I improved without new photography gear. Actually, the opposite is true as I focused on using just one single lens and on doing landscape photography only. The nice side efect was a much lighter backpack, which made longer trips much more enjoyable for me and left more time for getting a great shot with the equipment in my hands instead of changing lenses all the time.

All you need for landscape photography

I said that gear doesn't matter for beginners or hobby photographers in most cases, which is true as long as you have a minimum to work with. In my opinion only these 3 things are essential:

  1. Camera is able to shoot RAW format
  2. Camera is able to change the f-stop manually
  3. A good tripod (ideally with a remote control for your camera to prevent shakes while pressing the shutter button)

Forget about megapixels for a while and don't try to start with ND filters and don't make up a reason for yourself to get a full frame camera to get a better image quality for your star trail shots. These are all great techniques to get a certain type of result, but they won't improve your photography at all if you are still a beginner.

How I drastically improved my photography with just 2 little decisions

Cranehouses in Cologne, Germany

Decision 1 - Focus on just one thing

Before focusing on just one part of all these completely different types of photography, I just tried out the full range of themes by doing macro photography (bought a currently unused 70-300mm lens for that), tried so many diverse long time exposures, started to shoot people etc...

To cut a long story short, I wanted to try everything but I never had the chance to improve because every photo needed a completely different mindset and other technical aspects. My advice for you is to start focussing right now. I liked landscape photography the most so my decision for just one single lens led me to a 17-50mm. If you love portrait photography it may be another one based on what's important for you to start with. As I was only shooting with this minimal gear, I noticed that my view for good perspectives got so much better and even my people photography made a huge passive improvement. I only noticed this after I was asked to shoot at a wedding this year. I was very surprised about the results and even told the bridal couple before that they shouldn't expect too much as I hadn’t taken portrait photos in a long time (and to be honest they were really bad at that time). And guess what – I only used this one lens again that I am very familiar with by now. Less opportunities but much more time to focus on the important aspects and timings of a wedding for me as a beginner in wedding photography.

How I drastically improved my photography with just 2 little decisions

Manarola, Cinque Terre

Decision 2 - Learn how to post process your images

After focusing on just one thing in terms of getting a good shot I also decided to improve my post processing. As a professional web designer and product manager I have been working with Adobe Photoshop for years but this was a completely different workfow. In theory I knew all the basics on how to use this complex software, but not how to post process my images in the right way. The most important first step for many photographers is to stop considering Photoshop or a similar software as cheating, that's simply not the case. The human eye (and brain) for example is able to adapt very fast to high dynamic ranges, the camera isn’t. This is why people started doing HDRI in the first place. Most of the time I see my resulting images and remember the mood of the original scene in a complete different way. Colors often vary from what I remember and felt while I was experiencing an amazing sunset for example. Post processing gives me and all of you the opportunity to bring back everything which got lost in your photo. This is why it is so important to shoot RAW images, because they contain and keep much more details you can restore if you want. How much you have to "fix in Photoshop" mostly depends on your raw data, but since I learned so much stuf my personal preferences about what's really important changed in a huge way to the following order:

  1. Timing & Location
    Take your photos at the right time at the right spot with an amazing sunset or during blue hour and your results will be at least on a pretty decent level.
  2. Postprocessing
    The way you tune the final result mostly depends on your personal style. Have you ever seen an image and you instantly knew who took it? It may be the clothing etc. in portrait photography, but for landscapes it's mostly defned by the way you process your image.
  3. Taking the photo
    Unless you are completely destroying the photo by using a wrong focus to get very unsharp results or by setting your f-stop to 2.8 for landscapes you can't fail in this part. That's the most important part to understand in my opinion! Excellent professional photographers don't get the best results because they have the best and most expensive gear, but because they know the best timing to get a great shot and how to process this raw data. A very good example is one of my favorite photographers Kilian Schönberger, who knows exactly how to be right on time to get that foggy mystical mood in all of his images.
How I drastically improved my photography with just 2 little decisions

Park near John Hancock Center in Chicago, USA

Conclusion

Even if you haven't just found your passion for photography it's a good start to focus on something to improve your skills in this tiny scope. Looking back you will notice much bigger steps, which will also pay dividends for your entire photography knowledge and results.
If you already own a decent camera and you are currently thinking of investing your money into the next generation you should think twice about what you are trying to achieve. I would never keep an advanced wedding photographer from buying a new f1.8 lens if there is currently only a f4 available, but most of the time you would be far better of without more equipment. If you aren't using Adobe Lightroom (or Capture One), Adobe Photoshop or these amazing Nik and Topaz filters yet, you should initially think about investing in your post processing quality and learn how to use these tools.

Get the best articles to your inbox

only 1 mail / month

Comments (11)

Please log in or sign up for free to leave a comment or ask a question.
orange snapper
orange snapper 15.04.2016
Very helpful advice. Thank you. I am a hobby photographer struggling whether to get a better camera "which I thought" now I have a different perspective.
Manuel Becker
Manuel Becker 16.04.2016
Hope that this other perspective helps you! Try it and compare your results so that you get a feeling if this helps you, but usually a better camera doesn't make your photos better, because it's nearly never that I would say that a photo is bad because of too much noise when the image itself is great... you know what I mean? If you are a professional photographer and you need the output quality of a really expensive camera... well this may be something else, but that's usually not the case even if we all love to buy new equipment. I will try to write more articles with specific tips to get better, so I hope they will help you too! All the best and keep learning!! :)
Ralf Lune
Ralf Lune 10.04.2016
Wunderbarer Artikel. Leider hat es mich rund 30 Jahre fotografischer Zeit gekostet, um festzustellen, dass die Reduzierung auf ein Minimum der Schlüssel ist. Eigentlich hätte man es eher erkennen müssen: vor allem Leica zeigt seit Jahrzehnten, vor allem in Zeiten analoger Fotografie, dass man eine "kleine" Kamera der M-Serie und ein lichtstarkes Objektiv braucht und sonst nichts. Ich habe vor Monaten den Schritt gewagt: seit ich ein 35mm / f1,4 Objektiv und RAW für mich entdeckt habe, kommt kaum noch was anderes auf meine Kamera.
Ralf Lune
Ralf Lune 10.04.2016
Translation with the help of Mr. Google :-) Wonderful article . Unfortunately, it took me about 30 years of photographic time to determine that the reduction to a minimum is the key . Actually, I should have seen it sooner : especially Leica shows for decades , especially in times of analog photography, that a " small " camera M series and a good lens is all one needs. Months ago I have discovered a 35mm / f1.4 lens and RAW for me, since then I don't need anything else for my camera.
Manuel Becker
Manuel Becker 10.04.2016
Vielen lieben Dank Ralf. Ich kann dir der Einfachheit halber auch einfach auf Deutsch antworten ;-) 35mm wären mir für Landschaften glaube ich schon zu viel da ich es liebe möglichst viel im Bild einzufangen, aber ich finde es klasse das du diesen Schritt gemacht hast und sobald man das Gefühl für genau diese Kombination entwickelt hat kann man ja immer noch eine zweite Linse dazu nehmen. Wichtig ist es denke ich sich auf jeden Fall zu fokussieren um das Maximum aus dem gegebenen Equipment raus zu holen. Danke für dein Feedback!! :)
Ana Carolina Corneau
Ana Carolina Corneau 06.04.2016
I really like your articles. Please do it more. I'll be very happy if you make one telling us about your post processing techniques. :)
Manuel Becker
Manuel Becker 10.04.2016
Thank you very much dear Ana for your feedback. Post processing is already on my list I want to write about in the future, so stay tuned! :)
Paul Gabronis
Paul Gabronis 19.03.2016
Nice! looks like I'm not only one thinking this way ;)
Manuel Becker
Manuel Becker 19.03.2016
Yeah, welcome to the club dear Paul! :) I really appreciate your feedback, thank you!
Olga Dorovska
Olga Dorovska 28.02.2016
Thank You, Manuel, for these useful advices!
Manuel Becker
Manuel Becker 28.02.2016
You are welcome dear Olga, I am glad that you like them! :)

Where are the most amazing places for photography? Locationscout is a network of passionate photographers and travellers around the world, discovering it together.

Your opinion is important for us!

Do you like the idea / implementation of Locationscout or how could we do better? We would love to hear from you!

Ask a question or give us Feedback

Connect & discover with us